FACA Committee Purpose & Justification The information in this plan was imported from the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) database and transformed into StratML Part 1, Strategic Plan, format. Fiscal Year:2011 Committee Type: Scientific Technical Program Advisory Board Missile Defense Advisory Committee DOD 332ba9cc-84e2-496e-b8eb-af032675cd3a [21528]: Department of Defense [13]: http://www.defenselink.mil Sponsoring Agency Beneficiary Dr Graham T Allison Harvard University; Member: MDAC Geo-Political Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer Dr Kathleen L Bihari MIT Lincoln Laboratories; Member: MDAC Technical Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer Mr William P Delaney MIT Lincoln Laboratories; Member: MDAC Geo-Political Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer Dr Jennifer A Dooley Jet Propulsion Laboratory; Member: MDAC Technical Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer VADM David E Frost USN (Ret) Frost & Associates, Inc.; Member: MDAC Geo-Political Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer Dr Shannon M Hall JHU/APL; Member: MDAC Technical Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer Dr John E Heebner Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; Member: MDAC Technical Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer Dr J Clayton Kerce Argos Intelligence, LLC.; Member: MDAC Technical Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer Dr Theodore J Kim Sandia National Laboratories; Member: MDAC Technical Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer Dr William B Roper Jr MIT Lincoln Laboratories; Member: MDAC Technical Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer Mr Robert M Stein Private Consultant; Member: MDAC Geo-Political Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer Honorable John P Stenbit Private Consultant; Member: MDAC Geo-Political Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer GEN John H Tilelli USA (Ret) Cypress International, Inc.; Member: MDAC Geo-Political Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer Dr Gregory S Warrington The University of Vermont; Member: MDAC Technical Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer Honorable John H White Harvard University; Member: MDAC Geo-Political Subcommittee (3/24/11-9/30/11) Committee Member Special Government Employee (SGE) Performer Not Available adc825b1-138e-46f2-adfa-7a0c8c02bf55 The Missile Defense Advisory Committee (MDAC) provides the Secretary of Defense, through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics and the Director, Missile Defense Agency, independent advice and recommendations on all matters relating to missile defense, including system development, technology, program maturity and readiness of configurations of the Ballistic Missile Defense System. The Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics or designee may act upon the Committee's advice and recommendations. 61deb403-27a9-4000-b998-c5a88b7971cd Recommandations Not Available c2ff8296-ce51-48e7-8de3-128cfc318399 Make, Accept, Implement 9508d31c-938c-4d95-a83b-b3c5d52a4a16 dfb5dfad-5b9d-43d3-b759-3203cc2fb2e5 Recommendations Made Number Missile Defense Advisory Committee Department of Defense Unspecified n/a 2010-10-01 2011-09-30 Summary of Recommendations on Capabilities-Based Acquisition:Capabilities-Based Acquisition (CBA):1. Continue CBA as the basic approach to developing MDA program elementsa. The application of CBA will vary with the status of the program element2. Support a wider application of CBA in DoD3. Include a strong transition and production emphasis within the CBA conceptTransition to Production and Sustainment:4. DepSecDef direct a fully funded transition plan for each increment in each program elementa. Define respective responsibilities for further productionb. Define a mechanism for shared configuration controlc. Adjudicate and enforce O&S responsibilitiesd. MDA and Services fund to OSD CAIG cost estimates5. MDA assign production and sustainment phase responsibilities within each program element to an MDA/Service team that includes the appropriate experience in traditional acquisition and program management skillsBlock Names:6. Eliminate current time-defined blocks in favor of capability-defined increments7. Use dates for budget/POMMDA-Managed Systems:8. Need to develop the potential of MDA-managed systems that can contribute to other missionsSummary of Recommendations on the Technical Potential Capabilities of Missile Defense Systems Against a Certain Potential Level of Threat:Deterrence:9. Since deterrence will remain the fundamental U.S. strategy for the foreseeable future against near-peer ICMD and SLBM, assist DoD in:a. Policy/technical transparency discussions with near-peers to strengthen deterrenceb. Cooperation with near-peers on defense against rogue statesResearch and Development:10. Intensify R&D on advanced sensor newt and early intercept concepts to defeat countermeasures. Assist DoD in:a. Clarifying policy implicationsb. Overcoming Congressional objections to R&D on space-based interceptorsCombatant Commands and Services:11. In cooperation with Combatant Commands and Services, develop capabilities to degrade and defend against heavy attacks of advanced SRBMs/MRBMsa. Analyze and test against advanced threatsb. Identify inventory shortfallsSummary of Recommendations on the Appropriate Role for MDA in Developing Integrated Air and Missile Defenses for U.S. Forces, for the U.S. Homeland, and for American Allies:12. Consideration of MDA’s role in a specific geographical area13. Receiving the authority and resources for the role14. Clear objectives, authorities, funding, and personnel requiredSummary of Recommendations on the Space-Based Potential in the BMDS:15. Open and quantitative asessments16. Knowledge points17. Decision pointsSummary of Recommendations on Cooperation:18-26.Summary of Recommendations on Directed Energy:27-30.Summary of Recommendations on MDA Strategic Priorities: 31-49. 49 2010-10-01 2011-09-30 3c3dc950-a148-4ff0-b414-1174e14e6f46 Recommendations Fully Accepted Percentage Missile Defense Advisory Committee Department of Defense For a variety of its own reasons not applicable to the Committee, the agency may implement all/most of the recommendations, but few times recommendations are not implemented. n/a 2010-10-01 2011-09-30 The MDAC has successfully conducted and completed six studies. The first was an assessment of the MDA's Capabilities-Based Acquisition Approach (U). Completed in November 2006, the MDAC's outbrief to the Director, MDA provided recommendations in the areas of Approach, Transition to Production and Sustainment, Block Names, and MDA-Managed Systems. This report is unclassified and available on the FACA Database. To date, all recommendations have been adopted. The second study, completed in June 2007, was an assessment of the Technical Potential Capabilities of Missile Defense Systems Against a Certain Potential Level of Threat (U). The MDAC's outbrief to the Director, MDA provided recommendations in the areas of Deterrence, Research and Development, and Combatant Commands and Services. To date, all recommendations have been adopted. However, because this study involved classified matters of national security concern and to maintain the integrity and ultimate utility of the MDAC's findings, this study report is classified and MDA's feedback and comments cannot be released. The third study was an assessment on the Appropriate Role for MDA in Developing Integrated Air and Missile Defenses for U.S. Forces, for the U.S. Homeland, and for American Allies (U). Completed in May 2008, the MDAC's outbrief to the Director, MDA provided recommendations on MDA’s role in a specific geographical area. To date, recommendations are pending MDA senior leadership consideration. However, because this study involved classified matters of national security concern and to maintain the integrity and ultimate utility of the MDAC's findings, this study report is classified and MDA's feedback and comments cannot be released. The fourth study was a review of the Space-Based Potential in the BMDS (U). Completed in November 2008, the MDAC's outbrief to the Director, MDA provided recommendations proposed strategies, knowledge and decision points. To date, recommendations are pending MDA senior leadership consideration. However, because this study involved classified matters of national security concern and to maintain the integrity and ultimate utility of the MDAC's findings, this study report is classified and MDA's feedback and comments cannot be released. The fift and sixth studies, on BMD Cooperation and Directed Energy, and MDA Strategic Priorities, respectively, were completed August 2011. Due to their security classification, these reports and recommendations are not available for release. 65 2010-10-01 2011-09-30 ef28ee34-8c89-463a-b088-2e6e5fff5df9 Recommendations Partially Accepted Percentage Missile Defense Advisory Committee Department of Defense There are sometimes a few proposals which were not funded in their entirety, those few being scaled back from their original level of requested funding (allowable under the program). n/a 2010-10-01 2011-09-30 Recommendations on the Appropriate Role for MDA in Developing Integrated Air and Missile Defenses for U.S. Forces, for the U.S. Homeland, and for American Allies; BMD Cooperation, Directed Energy and MDA Strategic Priorities continue to or will be assessed and considered by MDA's executive leadership. 10 2010-10-01 2011-09-30 2010-10-01 2011-09-30 2013-07-09 http://explore.data.gov/resource/datasets/c5i3-bb9j Gannon (J.) Dick gannon_dick@yahoo.com Submit error.